[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vcrtqyc3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:01:32 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC : fat : default errors use FAT_ERRORS_CONT instead of FAT_ERRORS_RO.
NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
> Hi ogawa.
>
> I found different error exception between linux fat and windows fat.
>
> When fat is currputed by sudden unplug usb device formatted fat, fat
> does never change RO partition on windows.
>
> It said windows fat provide a chance that continuously access
> partition except corrupted file.
>
> Currently when access corrupted file, linux fat change RO parition
> from RW. So user no longer do open/write on linux fat.
>
> I suggest that the default errors of linux fat use FAT_ERRORS_CONT
> instead of FAT_ERRORS_RO.
>
> I want to know your opinion.
I think it is dangerous, and the default should be safer side.
If driver noticed the corruption, it means FS is not unknown state
anymore. Any files/directories are possibly corrupted.
Even if you change the file that seems to be uncorrupted, it may make FS
unrecoverable more. (e.g. lose all data in worst case)
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists