[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111013145353.161009ea.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:53:53 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net,
gthelen@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kirill@...temov.name, avagin@...allels.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure
controlling.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:24:23 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> This patch converts struct sock fields memory_pressure,
> memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem (now prot_mem)
> to function pointers, receiving a struct mem_cgroup parameter.
>
> enter_memory_pressure is kept the same, since all its callers
> have socket a context, and the kmem_cgroup can be derived from
> the socket itself.
>
> To keep things working, the patch convert all users of those fields
> to use acessor functions.
>
> In my benchmarks I didn't see a significant performance difference
> with this patch applied compared to a baseline (around 1 % diff, thus
> inside error margin).
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
a nitpick.
> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
> +enum {
> + UNDER_LIMIT,
> + OVER_LIMIT,
> +};
> +
It may be better to move this to res_counter.h or memcontrol.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists