lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110140249310.21487@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	"Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE)" <Laurence.Oberman@...com>
cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Seger, Mark" <mark.seger@...com>,
	"Cabaniols, Sebastien" <Sebastien.Cabaniols@...com>
Subject: Re: Regression in reading /proc/stat in the newer kernels with large
 SMP and NUMA configurations

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE) wrote:

> On the 2.6.16.x series sles or 2.6.18.x RHEL kernels each read takes 84 
> us.
> 
> dl785sles:~/wrk # cat 2.6.16.60-0.87.1-smp.log Opened, read and closed 8640 times and read total of 13996800 bytes
> % time     seconds  usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
>  99.41    0.725717          84      8641           read
>   0.38    0.002768           0      8642           open
>   0.21    0.001539           0      8642           close
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           write
>   0.00    0.000000           0         3           fstat
>   0.00    0.000000           0         8           mmap
>   0.00    0.000000           0         2           mprotect
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           munmap
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           brk
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1         1 access
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           madvise
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           execve
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           arch_prctl
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
> 100.00    0.730024                 25945         1 total    
> 
> On the 2.6.38.4 kernel each read takes > 6ms
> 
> dl785sles:~/wrk # cat 2.6.38.4-smp.log
> Opened, read and closed 8640 times and read total of 86235840 bytes
> % time     seconds  usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
> 100.00   59.021650        6830      8641           read
>   0.00    0.000520           0      8642           open
>   0.00    0.000425           0      8642           close
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           write
>   0.00    0.000000           0         3           fstat
>   0.00    0.000000           0         9           mmap
>   0.00    0.000000           0         2           mprotect
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           munmap
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           brk
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1         1 access
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           madvise
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           execve
>   0.00    0.000000           0         1           arch_prctl
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
> 100.00   59.022595                 25946         1 total        
> 

The overhead is probably in kstat_irqs_cpu() which is called for each 
possible irq for each of the 32 possible cpus, and /proc/stat actually 
does the sum twice.  You would see the same type of overhead with 
/proc/interrupts if it wasn't masked by the locking that it requires to 
safely read irq_desc.  "dmesg | grep nr_irqs" will show how many percpu 
variables are being read for every cpu twice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ