lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318600023.2223.18.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date:	Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:47:03 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Seger, Mark" <mark.seger@...com>
Cc:	"Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE)" <Laurence.Oberman@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Cabaniols, Sebastien" <Sebastien.Cabaniols@...com>
Subject: RE: Regression in reading /proc/stat in the newer kernels with
 large SMP and NUMA configurations

Le vendredi 14 octobre 2011 à 14:36 +0100, Seger, Mark a écrit :

> For me the easiest reproducer, which admittedly doesn't show any
> deeper analysis, is to just run "cat /proc/stat>/dev/null" in a loop
> and time it.

OK, but you already provided a global number.

We would like to check where in kernel cpu time is consumed.
Maybe something really obvious could pop out.

"perf" is provided in kernel sources, and really is a piece of cake.

cd tools/perf ; make 



2x4x2 means : Two sockets, 4 cores per physical package, 2 threads per
core.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ