[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173BE1A283@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:12:18 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"Colin Cross (ccross@...roid.com)" <ccross@...roid.com>,
Erik Gilling <konkers@...roid.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm/tegra: select AUTO_ZRELADDR by default
Arnd Bergmann wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 9:30 AM:
...
> You mention that tegra30 will require AUTO_ZRELADDR.
Well, just to be clear, here's the situation I think:
Tegra20's SDRAM starts at physical address 0.
Tegra30's SDRAM starts at physical address 2G.
To support that, we could either:
a) Introduce a new Kconfig variable for Tegra30, make T20/T30 mutually
exclusive, and update arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile.boot to set zreladdr
etc. based on the new Tegra30 config variable too. Then, there's no need
for AUTO_ZRELADDR anywhere.
b) Have no new config variable, build a unified T20/T30 kernel, leave
Makefile.boot untouched, and rely on using AUTO_ZRELADDR for Tegra30 to
account for the different SDRAM physical addresses.
> Does that mean that with tegra30 merged you would no longer be able
> to build any tegra kernel?
Sorry, I don't quite understand that question.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists