[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E986738.9050504@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:45:44 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pata_sil680: minor CodingStyle fixups
On 10/12/2011 07:03 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>
>>> + /* This last case is _NOT_ ok */
>>> + case 0x30:
>>> + printk(KERN_ERR "sil680: Clock disabled ?\n");
>>
>> pr_err()? Or checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it (I forgot)?
>
> dev_ would be even better but that seems to be a separate thing. The
> existing patch is still a move in the right direction.
agreed x 2
To be specific, it should be
dev_err(&pdev->dev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists