[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9881A6.9050106@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:38:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, rth@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V5 00/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
On 10/14/2011 11:35 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> A nice featuer of jump labels, is that it allows the various branches
> (currently we only support 2), to be written in c code (as opposed to asm),
> which means you can write your code as you normally would and access any
> parameters as you normally would - hopefully, making the code pretty
> readable as well.
>
> I hope this better clarifies the use-cases for the various mechanisms.
>
There is an important subcase which might be handy which would be to
allow direct patching of call instructions instead of using indirect calls.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists