[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111014.004915.1737071409851288288.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:49:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/29] sparc/PCI: convert to pci_create_root_bus()
for correct root bus resources
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:46:54 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:28:18 -0600
>
>> Convert from pci_create_bus() to pci_create_root_bus(). This way the root
>> bus resources are correct immediately. This patch doesn't fix anything
>> because sparc fixed them before scanning the bus, but it makes it more
>> consistent with other architectures.
>>
>> I didn't work out where pcibios_fixup_bus() is called. I don't see a
>> use of pci_scan_bus(), pci_scan_bus_parented(), or pci_scan_child_bus().
>>
>> CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> The pcibios_fixup_bus() case here (sparc64) is an artifact from when
> we actually probed the PCI config space for device probing on sparc64,
> and pci_bus_probe() would invoke it.
>
> Unfortunately we can't delete this function now even though it's empty
> with your changes, because drivers/pci/probe.o is unconditionally
> linked into the kernel when CONFIG_PCI even when an architecture
> (such as sparc64) doesn't use the majority of the code in it.
Sorry, forgot to give this an ACK :-)
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists