[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB4F747A9@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:06:57 -0400
From: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Satoru Moriya <smoriya@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
On 10/12/2011 08:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> I understand what you concern. But in some area such as banking,
>> > stock exchange, train/power/plant control sysemts etc this kind
>> > of tunable is welcomed because they can tune their systems at
>> > their own risk.
>> >
> You haven't tried the patch that increases the priority of kswapd when
> such a latency sensitive thread triggers background reclaim?
No, not yet. I'll try it.
Thanks,
Satoru--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists