[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111015064242.GA23349@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:42:42 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Answers to some common kernel.org account questions
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:21:00AM -0600, Greg KH wrote:
> WHAT ABOUT FILE UPLOADS?
>
> The "robot signing" of uploaded files that was used in the past is no
> longer considered to be sufficiently secure, so a new policy has been
> instituted. A new tool ("kup") has been developed to help with the
> implementation of that policy; it works in a manner similar to the
> upload system used by the Debian project.
>
> The kup tool will require developers to sign files with their PGP key
> prior to uploading to kernel.org. This mechanism will keep the private
> signing keys from ever being stored on kernel.org (or any other server).
> More information will be made available once the file upload capability
> is restored.
Please reassure me, we will only have to upload the sig, not the whole
file ? I'm assuming that it will still be possible to generate the files
from the git tree (which should produce the exact same file, hence the
same sig). I'm asking because uploading 2*75 MB kernels will take slightly
more than two hours at full load assuming the link does not break at all
during this time, while a git push of one hundred patches only takes a
few seconds. This is a huge difference in efficiency and reliability !
Regards,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists