linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1318698672.23438.22.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date:	Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:41:12 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
	DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:29 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> 
> > Nevertheless, cyclic should be supported for all dmaengine APIs (but not
> > adding new APIs for cyclic) and in consistent manner by having a generic
> > cyclic flag and caps.
> >
> You are already merging Cyclic into Slave_sg. And Slave_sg could be
> merged into this api. So overall we would get rid one parameter passed
> outside of the parameter structure - dmaxfer_template. (Yes I want to
> reduce dependence on 'flags' argument as much as possible). 
The flags parameter already exists and we are not using it properly in
slave cases.

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/