[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111016222847.GM18470@longonot.mountain>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:28:47 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: mousevsc: Move the mouse driver out of
staging
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:36:36PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> This do {} while (1); seems like it could be simpler,
> less indented and less confusing if it used continues
> or gotos like below (if I wrote it correctly...)
>
> loop:
> ret = vmbus_bus_recvpacket_raw(device->channel, buffer,
> bufferlen, &bytes_recvd, &req_id);
> switch (ret) {
> case -ENOBUFS:
> /* Handle large packet */
> bufferlen = bytes_recvd;
> buffer = kzalloc(bytes_recvd, GFP_ATOMIC);
> /*
> Why kzalloc and not kmalloc?
> The stack variable packet is not memset to 0,
> why should buffer be zeroed?
> */
> if (!buffer)
> return;
> goto loop;
> case 0:
> if (bytes_recvd <= 0)
> goto loop;
In the original we called break here (which is equivelent to a
return). Btw setting a stack variable and then returning immediately
like the original code did is pointless.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists