[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111016091009.GB32551@sig21.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:10:09 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
> > What I meant to say is Markus' statement that the device only
> > works at a certain transfer size cannot be true since
> > this size is not visible to the device via the USB bus.
>
> That's what I would expect, too. But did you take a look at the usbmon
> traces Markus acquired?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=131845614819045&w=2
I glanced at them for 3 seconds, but I cannot be bothered
to analyze them in detail. The ASCII usbmon traces don't
show full USB packet contents anyway so you can't see if
partial MPEG TS packets are missing.
> They aren't completely definitive because the communications between
> the computer and the device _before_ the bulk transfers started were
> different. However they do clearly show the device working with
> 24064-byte transfers and not working with 12288+11776-byte transfers.
The device transfers data in the "not working" case, it's just that
the MPEG TS sync byte is not where Markus expects it, which could
be explained by a partial MPEG TS packet left in the device's FIFO
from previous interaction.
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists