linux-kernel - Re: Please include const-sections into linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110151752060.5728@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please include const-sections into linux-next

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, James Bottomley wrote:

> I think it's probably a compiler bug.  gcc isn't as adept with section
> annotations as people think it is.  This tends to manifest in the
> non-x86 toolchains because we tend to be using earlier versions.
> 

It compiles fine with my cross-compiler using gcc-4.5.1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/