[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318848001.6594.45.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:40:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:03 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That's not a micro optimization, it's a massive performance hit if you
> force those 32bit archs to do 64/32 all over the place.
>
Linus could just say he doesn't care about 32bit and everybody sane
should just get a 64bit machine.. but I suspect that's a few more years.
Although I hope not too long, even my phone could do with more than 2G
of memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists