[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111017110946.GA21384@amt.cnet>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:09:46 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] kvm: set affinity hint for assigned device msi
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:12:23PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:54:50AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:38:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > To forward an interrupt to a vcpu that runs on
> > > a host cpu different from the current one,
> > > we need an ipi which likely will cost us as much
> > > as delivering the interrupt directly to that cpu would.
> > >
> > > Set irq affinity hint to point there, irq balancer
> > > can then take this into accound and balance
> > > interrupts accordingly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 8 +++++---
> > > virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Or maybe even automatic in-kernel irq affinity disabled by
default (to avoid interference with userspace pinning).
All of that if it makes sense performance wise, of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists