[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111017015542.GH19421@leaf>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:55:42 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 44/55] rcu: wire up RCU_BOOST_PRIO for
rcutree
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:00:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> RCU boost threads start life at RCU_BOOST_PRIO, while others remain
> at RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO. While here, change thread names to match other
> kthreads, and adjust rcu_yield() to not override the priority set by
> the user. This last change sets the stage for runtime changes to
> priority in the -rt tree.
This seems like either two or three independent changes, which should go
in separate commits. You could plausibly group the rcu_yield changes
together with the rest, but the thread naming seems like a separate
commit.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists