linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111017161854.GB5108@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:18:54 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, jamie@...ieiles.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> +void soc_device_unregister(struct device *dev)

Ick, no, pass in the struct soc_device, which the register function
should return, not a "raw" struct device.


> +{
> +	struct soc_device *soc_dev =
> +		container_of(dev, struct soc_device, dev);
> +
> +	sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &soc_attr_group);
> +
> +	if (device_is_registered(dev))
> +		device_unregister(dev);

Why is this call needed?

> +
> +	bus_unregister(&soc_bus_type);

What happens if you have more than one SOC device?  I think you just
oopsed.

> +
> +	kfree(soc_dev->attr);
> +	kfree(soc_dev);

Nope, you just failed again.  I can tell you never tried this code path,
otherwise you would have noticed the HUGE warnings that the kernel spit
back at you.  Please fix this.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/