[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111017181117.GA17422@sig21.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:11:18 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
> > It would make a difference if the
> > device violated the spec and sent 188 byte packets. However, the
> > spec says a short packet terminates the transfer. But I wonder
> > if this is really the case?
>
> The device does not send short packets. If it did, the 24064-byte
> transfers would end early.
Re-reading the USB-2.0 standard, a short packet which terminates
the transfer is defined by packet_size < wMaxPacketSize,
not by packet_size < 512.
Thus wMaxPacketSize == 188 (or 2*188) might be possible.
There is a comment in linux/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c:
/* The USB spec says that high speed bulk endpoints
* always use 512 byte maxpacket. But some device
* vendors decided to ignore that, and MSFT is happy
* to help them do so. So now people expect to use
* such nonconformant devices with Linux too; sigh.
*/
Maybe we should look at the descriptors?
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists