[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9CA772.4000509@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:08:50 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
On 10/17/2011 02:39 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> We can do much better than that with reciprocal multiplication.
>
> Yes, 2^64/1e9 is the reciprocal.
>
What I mean is that it's pretty easy to work it so it doesn't have the
errors. We have 32*32 = 64 multiplication on all 32-bit platforms I'm
99.9% sure.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists