[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110171139040.3240@ionos>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:39:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen: IPI interrupts not resumed early enough on
suspend/resume
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:51 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > Ping? The original issue has made it into longterm-2.6.32.y and then
> > > > onto Debian (bug #644604) so people keep asking me about it...
> > >
> > > Sorry, the previous version had a warning in it (was missing the return
> > > type for resume_irqs), fixed up version follows.
> > >
> > > I noticed that the backport to longterm 2.6.32 won't work since syscore
> > > isn't available back then. I think one approach for the backport would
> > > be to call irq_pm_syscore_resume() directly from sysdev_resume(), does
> > > that sound sensible?
> >
> > I think so. Can you please add a description (or the five lines patch)
> > for the stable folks to the changelog, so they don't have to dig
> > around ?
>
> If you are happy with the mainline version I'll send out a backported
> version to stable@.
Fine. I queue the other one for 3.2
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists