[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFB632D60B.6534A38B-ON6525792D.003A1B21-6525792D.003B0DB8@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:16:41 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix guest memory leak and panic
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote on 10/18/2011 03:17:11 PM:
> > I think the best thing might be to remove the additional ref taking
from
> > the setter function and audit the previous changes to ensure they
> > conform. I'll do that right away and post a fixup patch ASAP.
>
> Sigh, only one out of the ten callers of (__)skb_frag_set_page expects
> skb_frag_set_page to take a new reference. I think that's pretty
> comprehensive evidence that the current behaviour is unexpected and
> wrong.
Looks good!
Does it make sense to commit both of these patches? The
reason being - my patch becomes a cleanup of set_skb_frag()
in virtio_net driver.
thanks,
- KK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists