[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9D5FAB.2080605@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:14:51 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, jamie@...ieiles.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices
On 17/10/11 17:18, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> +void soc_device_unregister(struct device *dev)
>
> Ick, no, pass in the struct soc_device, which the register function
> should return, not a "raw" struct device.
Okay.
>> +{
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev =
>> + container_of(dev, struct soc_device, dev);
>> +
>> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &soc_attr_group);
>> +
>> + if (device_is_registered(dev))
>> + device_unregister(dev);
>
> Why is this call needed?
To unregister a previously unregistered device?
Is that wrong?
>> +
>> + bus_unregister(&soc_bus_type);
>
> What happens if you have more than one SOC device? I think you just
> oopsed.
I think you're right.
When to you suggest we unregister the bus?
>> +
>> + kfree(soc_dev->attr);
>> + kfree(soc_dev);
>
> Nope, you just failed again. I can tell you never tried this code path,
> otherwise you would have noticed the HUGE warnings that the kernel spit
> back at you. Please fix this.
I'll look into it.
Thanks.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists