linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: System call 'sendmsg' of process ospfd (quagga) causes kernel oops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1318937878.2657.50.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date:	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:37:58 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Elmar Vonlanthen <evonlanthen@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: System call 'sendmsg' of process ospfd (quagga) causes
 kernel oops

Le mardi 18 octobre 2011 à 12:45 +0200, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:23:43PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> > You're right, if reallocations are OK in all paths.
> 
> If it wasn't OK then making needed_headroom constant won't work
> anyway.
> 
> > We'll need to change LL_RESERVED_SPACE() / LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EXTRA() /
> > LL_ALLOCATED_SPACE() macros and provide the [read once] values, instead
> > of a [read once] pointer to values.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here.  I don't see any need to change
> these macros.  All we need is to save the value in a local variable:
> 
> 	hh_len = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> 
> 	skb = alloc_skb(hh_len + len);
> 	skb_reserve(skb, hh_len);
> 

Not really Herbert. Please read again my patch changelog.

In the bug we try to fix, we have :

skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, ... + LL_ALLOCATED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev) 

... < increase of dev->needed_headroom by another cpu/task >

skb_reserve(skb, LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev));

skb_put() -> crash because we reserved too much space

So we really want LL_ALLOCATED_SPACE() and LL_RESERVED_SPACE() use the
same needed_headroom, or else you can have LL_RESERVED_SPACE() >
LL_ALLOCATED_SPACE().

There are several way to fix this, but this kind of code assumed the
dev->needed... values were consistent for the whole block.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/