[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_0hXDjKnmQF6OtoeC=mmqfNRK6pVSf4ZA+2Jn9BHFWV2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:07:11 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
peter.ujfalusi@...com, aghayal@...eaurora.org, david@...deman.nu,
Shubhrajyoti@...com, saaguirre@...com, hemanthv@...com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] input/cma3000_d0x: Check silicon version
Hello Jonathan
>> + if (rev != CMA3000_REV) {
>> + error = -EINVAL;
>> + pr_err("CMA3000 Accelerometer: Unknown Revision %x\n", rev);
> warning perhaps rather than error?
IMHO it should be an error. If the revision is different, either you
are in front of a unknown chip or the chip is going to behave
differently and lead into an unstable system. Better be safe than
sorry.
> Patch could do with a statement of why anyone would care about this.
>> error = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, cma3000_thread_irq,
>> pdata->irqflags | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> "cma3000_d0x", data);
You are right... not so useful information :). Maybe as part of a
sysfs file, but definately not as as a printk
>
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists