linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/21 v2] m68k: drop unused Kconfig symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1318941043.6414.35.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:30:43 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/21 v2] m68k: drop unused Kconfig symbols

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:07 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > - dropped SOM5282EM too (discovered this while doing this second
> >    version, my scripts aren't smart enough too catch it)
> 
> Hmm. I don't want to lose the SOM5282EM config option. Although it
> isn't used inside the code it does let the configurer know that this
> specific board is supported.

Isn't there another way? You're also adding a configuration option. This
means your configurer has to make a decision whether or not to enable
support for that board while this decision actually has no effect.
Apparently that support comes for free (I'm guessing once M528x support
is enabled, I haven't checked that). Wouldn't a comment do? Or adding a
line to some help text? 

In the mean time I suppose you're willing to fix this part of my patch
yourself (ie, I don't have to redo this again).

Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/