[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111018145649.GB10054@totoro>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:56:49 +0100
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > Also, (and I'm right at the edge of my knowledge here!) wouldn't you
> > also need to add reference counting of the module when
> > creating/destroying a soc device to prevent the module and bus
> > disappearing whilst you had devices with a reference to it?
>
> No, that's not necessary in a case like this: The bus module remains
> pinned by the reference of the module calling it on each exported
> symbol that is referenced. The reference counting is only needed
> if driver module provides function pointers to the bus module
> that might be in the middle of getting called while the driver is
> removed. We have this case with the ux500_get_process function
> that may be called through sysfs, so that would be a bug if the
> code calling device_create_file() was in a module.
Ahh, okay that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation Arnd.
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists