[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110181724560.3240@ionos>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:26:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: cputimer: Cure lock inversion
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Mon Oct 17 11:50:30 CEST 2011
> >
> > There's a lock inversion between the cputimer->lock and rq->lock; notably
> > the two callchains involved are:
>
> Thanks, looks nice and small. Simon - can you check that this works for you?
>
> Thomas/Ingo - once confirmed by Simon, should I take it directly or
> will this come through your trees?
I have it queued in timers/urgent and run it through testing at the
moment. Will send a pull request once confirmed.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists