linux-kernel - [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1318951981-5508-20-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:02:54 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	agruen@...nel.org, bfields@...ldses.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@...hat.com
Cc:	aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...nel.org>

This function is used to avoid storing richacls on disk if the acl can
be computed from the file permission bits.

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/richacl_base.c       |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/richacl.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 6c7e839..3a9842e 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -560,3 +560,57 @@ richacl_inherit(const struct richacl *dir_acl, int isdir)
 
 	return acl;
 }
+
+/**
+ * richacl_equiv_mode  -  check if @acl is equivalent to file permission bits
+ * @mode_p:	the file mode (including the file type)
+ *
+ * If @acl can be fully represented by file permission bits, this function
+ * returns 0, and the file permission bits in @mode_p are set to the equivalent
+ * of @acl.
+ *
+ * This function is used to avoid storing richacls on disk if the acl can be
+ * computed from the file permission bits.  It allows user-space to make sure
+ * that a file has no explicit richacl set.
+ */
+int
+richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *acl, mode_t *mode_p)
+{
+	const struct richace *ace = acl->a_entries;
+	unsigned int x;
+	mode_t mode;
+
+	if (acl->a_count != 1 ||
+	    acl->a_flags != ACL4_MASKED ||
+	    !richace_is_everyone(ace) ||
+	    !richace_is_allow(ace) ||
+	    ace->e_flags & ~ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO)
+		return -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Figure out the permissions we care about: ACE4_DELETE_CHILD is
+	 * meaningless for non-directories, so we ignore it.
+	 */
+	x = ~ACE4_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
+	if (!S_ISDIR(*mode_p))
+		x &= ~ACE4_DELETE_CHILD;
+
+	mode = richacl_masks_to_mode(acl);
+	if ((acl->a_group_mask & x) != (richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 3) & x) ||
+	    (acl->a_other_mask & x) != (richacl_mode_to_mask(mode) & x))
+		return -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ignore permissions which the owner is always allowed.
+	 */
+	x &= ~ACE4_POSIX_OWNER_ALLOWED;
+	if ((acl->a_owner_mask & x) != (richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 6) & x))
+		return -1;
+
+	if ((ace->e_mask & x) != (ACE4_POSIX_MODE_ALL & x))
+		return -1;
+
+	*mode_p = (*mode_p & ~S_IRWXUGO) | mode;
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_equiv_mode);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 15953ae..4eeb22f 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ extern struct richacl *richacl_chmod(struct richacl *, mode_t);
 extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *,
 			      unsigned int);
 extern struct richacl *richacl_inherit(const struct richacl *, int);
+extern int richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *, mode_t *);
 
 /* richacl_inode.c */
 extern struct richacl *richacl_inherit_inode(const struct richacl *,
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/