[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318906095.23438.175.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:18:15 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jaswinder.singh@...aro.org, 21cnbao@...il.com,
rmk@....linux.org.uk, Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, Zhang Wei <zw@...kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....lapis-semi.com>,
Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@...sung.com>,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dmaengine: move drivers to dma_transfer_direction
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 14:52 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A general note to this rework. I haven't been cc'ed on patch 00/10,
> so,
> replying here. Are we sure it is a good idea to name these new macros
> like
> this:
>
> MEM_TO_DEV,
> DEV_TO_MEM,
> ...
>
> i.e., without a common namespace? Wouldn't something like
> DMA_DIRECTION_*
> be better?
Yes makes sense. I am leaning towards DMA_*
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists