[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111018180751.GA18590@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:07:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: cputimer: Cure lock inversion
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Mon Oct 17 11:50:30 CEST 2011
> >
> > There's a lock inversion between the cputimer->lock and rq->lock; notably
> > the two callchains involved are:
>
> Thanks, looks nice and small. Simon - can you check that this works for you?
>
> Thomas/Ingo - once confirmed by Simon, should I take it directly or
> will this come through your trees?
Yeah, we have it in -tip already and it was tested all day, lemme
cook up a pull request to not hold up the v3.1 release much longer..
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists