[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyk50v0hRNbtfF3cskAH7U-yWpHQzA+tRDFZVa6n-F_yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:12:41 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> It does not look related.
Yeah, the only lock held there seems to be the socket lock, and it
looks like all CPU's are spinning on it.
> Could you try to reproduce that problem with
> lockdep enabled? lockdep might make it go away, but it's definitely
> worth a try.
And DEBUG_SPINLOCK / DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP too. Maybe you're triggering
some odd networking thing. It sounds unlikely, but maybe some error
case you get into doesn't release the socket lock.
I think PROVE_LOCKING already enables DEBUG_SPINLOCK, but the sleeping
lock thing is separate, iirc.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists