linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] ARM 4Kstacks: Add support for 4K kernel stacks to ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E9E0BC6.1030505@am.sony.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:29:10 -0700
From:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM 4Kstacks: Add support for 4K kernel stacks to ARM

This saves 4K per kernel thread and user-space process.
For systems with lots of threads, this can save
100s of K of memory.

Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig                   |   13 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h |    7 ++++++-
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S     |    4 ++--
 arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S          |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 3146ed3..321ee11 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1555,6 +1555,19 @@ config OABI_COMPAT
 	  UNPREDICTABLE (in fact it can be predicted that it won't work
 	  at all). If in doubt say Y.

+config 4KSTACKS
+	bool "Use 4K kernel stacks instead of 8K"
+	default n
+	help
+	  This option will use less memory for each kernel stack in the
+	  system, which can save potentially hundreds of kilobytes of memory.
+	  It also helps reduce fragmentation in kernel memory.  However,
+	  it can be dangerous since not all kernel code paths are thrifty
+	  in their use of the stack.  Unless you have carefully monitored your
+	  kernel stack usage and verified that your programs and kernel
+	  usage patterns will not overflow 4K, you should leave this set
+	  to N.
+
 config ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL
 	bool

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 7b5cc8d..3021d06 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -15,8 +15,13 @@
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <asm/fpstate.h>

+#ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
 #define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER	1
-#define THREAD_SIZE		8192
+#else
+#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER	0
+#endif
+
+#define THREAD_SIZE		(4096 << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER)
 #define THREAD_START_SP		(THREAD_SIZE - 8)

 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
index 9a8531e..c818505 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@
 	.endm

 	.macro	get_thread_info, rd
-	mov	\rd, sp, lsr #13
-	mov	\rd, \rd, lsl #13
+	mov	\rd, sp, lsr #12 + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
+	mov	\rd, \rd, lsl #12 + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
 	.endm

 	@
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
index 307a4de..27c0907 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
  * act_mm - get current->active_mm
  */
 	.macro	act_mm, rd
-	bic	\rd, sp, #8128
-	bic	\rd, \rd, #63
+	mov	\rd, sp, lsr #12 + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
+	mov	\rd, \rd, lsl #12 + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER
 	ldr	\rd, [\rd, #TI_TASK]
 	ldr	\rd, [\rd, #TSK_ACTIVE_MM]
 	.endm
-- 
1.6.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/