lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111019144551.GA4829@totoro>
Date:	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:45:51 +0100
From:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...e.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device*
 functions

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:43:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 17/10/11 12:59, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
[...]
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
> >> index f8adff8..089371e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
> > [...]
> >> -static inline struct platform_device *
> >> -dbx500_add_msp_i2s(int id, resource_size_t base, int irq,
> >> -		   struct msp_i2s_platform_data *pdata)
> >> -{
> >> -	return dbx500_add_platform_device_4k1irq("MSP_I2S", id, base, irq,
> >> -						 pdata);
> >> +	struct resource resources[] = {
> >> +		DEFINE_RES_MEM(base, SZ_4K),
> >> +		DEFINE_RES_IRQ(irq),
> >> +	};
> >> +
> >> +	return platform_device_register_resndata(parent, "nmk-i2c",
> >> +						 id, resources,
> >> +						 ARRAY_SIZE(resources),
> >> +						 pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
> >>  }
> > 
> > I think you need platform_device_register_full() rather than 
> > platform_device_register_resndata() here as dbx500_add_platform_device() 
> > also set a dma mask which platform_device_register_resndata() doesn't 
> > do.  Otherwise a nice diffstat!
> 
> Good spot.
> 
> I can't seem to find platform_device_register_full(). Does it exist?

Yes, but it's in linux-next rather than Linus' tree (new helper to 
create platform devices with dma mask).

Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ