linux-kernel - RE: [RFC -v2] x86 RAS: Reorganize functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301F19DBD9F@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:08:25 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC -v2] x86 RAS: Reorganize functionality

> and what I actually would like to see is something like

[ ] Reliability, Availability, Serviceability
[ ]  Machine Check Architecture
[ ]	Intel-specific features
	[ ] CMCI / overheating reporting
	[ ] MCE decoding
	[ ] MCE injection
[ ]	AMD-specific features
	[ ] Error thresholding
	[ ] MCE decoding
	[ ] MCE injection
[ ] ...

Where does EINJ and other APEI bits fit into this ... it isn't Intel
specific (Is it? Do AMD BIOS writers include it??). It would be nice
for it to eventually move in with the other "RAS" bit, rather than
being hidden under a couple of levels of ACPI menus.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/