[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111020094140.GK18713@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:41:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Cc: patches@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, lrg@...com,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:12:10AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 October 2011 08:40 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >I don't see any issue with leaving some things out of the DT bindings;
> >you were the one raising that as a concern.
> The problem is, that there doesn't seem to be a clean way to embed
> *board data* into the kernel with DT, if left out of the DT bindings.
> There is the auxdata way of still attaching platform_data, but that I
> thought was a stopgap for just handling function pointers.
We can always start off just completely omitting the data and then see
how we go from there. If we only cover 50% of users that's still 50%
more than are currently covered with device tree right now and it means
we can then spin round and look at the bits that are hard again without
review fatigue on the bits that are easy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists