[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdae_DWEMQc+NOT1oX4XXKFzjXg3uiHihXMHr+ztPPAQdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:48:56 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rongjun Ying <Rongjun.Ying@....com>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: Don't copy function name when requesting a pin
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> Instead, store a pointer to the currently assigned function.
>
> This allows us to delete the mux_requested variable from pin_desc; a pin
> is requested if its currently assigned function is non-NULL.
>
> When a pin is requested as a GPIO rather than a regular function, the
> assigned function name is dynamically constructed. In this case, we have
> to kstrdup() the dynamically constructed name, so that mux_function doesn't
> pointed at stack data. This requires pin_free to be told whether to free
> the mux_function pointer or not.
>
> This removes the hard-coded maximum function name length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Thanks, applied.
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists