[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111020172218.GE31337@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:22:19 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: patches@...aro.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
lrg@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
* Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [111020 09:31]:
>
> That's where a DT entry specific configuration string might be the best
> option as it still allows describing the hardware using DT standards,
> while also allowing board specific configuration too.
Hmm, actually, can't we just pass the board specific configuration in
the board specific .dts file and then it gets merged in with the
arch independent DT node?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists