linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] blk-throttle: Take blkcg->lock while traversing blkcg->policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1319144906-5066-2-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:08:26 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaxboe@...ionio.com
Cc:	vgoyal@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] blk-throttle: Take blkcg->lock while traversing blkcg->policy_list

blkcg->policy_list is protected by blkcg->lock. Its not rcu protected
list. So even for readers, they need to take blkcg->lock. There are
few functions which were reading the list without taking lock. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
---
 block/blk-cgroup.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 4ddf11f..1b5d789 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -879,60 +879,86 @@ unsigned int blkcg_get_weight(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
 			      dev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int weight;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
 
 	pn = blkio_policy_search_node(blkcg, dev, BLKIO_POLICY_PROP,
 				BLKIO_PROP_weight_device);
 	if (pn)
-		return pn->val.weight;
+		weight = pn->val.weight;
 	else
-		return blkcg->weight;
+		weight = blkcg->weight;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
+
+	return weight;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkcg_get_weight);
 
 uint64_t blkcg_get_read_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, dev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	uint64_t bps = -1;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
 	pn = blkio_policy_search_node(blkcg, dev, BLKIO_POLICY_THROTL,
 				BLKIO_THROTL_read_bps_device);
 	if (pn)
-		return pn->val.bps;
-	else
-		return -1;
+		bps = pn->val.bps;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
+
+	return bps;
 }
 
 uint64_t blkcg_get_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, dev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	uint64_t bps = -1;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
 	pn = blkio_policy_search_node(blkcg, dev, BLKIO_POLICY_THROTL,
 				BLKIO_THROTL_write_bps_device);
 	if (pn)
-		return pn->val.bps;
-	else
-		return -1;
+		bps = pn->val.bps;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
+
+	return bps;
 }
 
 unsigned int blkcg_get_read_iops(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, dev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int iops = -1;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
 	pn = blkio_policy_search_node(blkcg, dev, BLKIO_POLICY_THROTL,
 				BLKIO_THROTL_read_iops_device);
 	if (pn)
-		return pn->val.iops;
-	else
-		return -1;
+		iops = pn->val.iops;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
+
+	return iops;
 }
 
 unsigned int blkcg_get_write_iops(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, dev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int iops = -1;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkcg->lock, flags);
 	pn = blkio_policy_search_node(blkcg, dev, BLKIO_POLICY_THROTL,
 				BLKIO_THROTL_write_iops_device);
 	if (pn)
-		return pn->val.iops;
-	else
-		return -1;
+		iops = pn->val.iops;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkcg->lock, flags);
+
+	return iops;
 }
 
 /* Checks whether user asked for deleting a policy rule */
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/