[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EA0937F.3040400@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:32:47 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Exclude E820_RESERVED regions and memory holes
above 4 GB from direct mapping.
On 10/20/2011 02:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 02:28 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com> writes:
>>
>>> On systems with very large memory (1 TB in our case), BIOS may report a
>>> reserved region or a hole in the E820 map, even above the 4 GB range. Exclude
>>> these from the direct mapping.
>>
>> This doesn't make much sense. Holes above 4GB are completely legal.
>>
>> If you need to workaround a specific broken BIOS you would need a quirk
>> only matching that system, with a suitable "BIOS is broken" message.
>>
>
> The problem is that apparently right now we map those unconditionally
> into the 1:1 map and mark them cacheable in PAT, which we *don't* for
> the < 4 GiB map.
>
> This thus makes the behavior match < 4 GiB, which is the correct
> behavior; this should be made clear in the patch description.
>
Specifically, it's fine for them to be mapped; it's not fine for them to
be mapped cacheable.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists