linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: Increase symbol KSYM_NAME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111021152357.GA2320@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:23:57 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu, anton@...ba.org,
	daahern@...co.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: Increase symbol KSYM_NAME_LEN size

Em Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:14:06PM +0300, Pekka Enberg escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
> > and it has worked at least until t^16384 both in gcc and in gdb, and I
> > guess it would have continue working until much more.
> >
> > Right now, I think we can increase it until 512, to be on the safe
> > side, and keep it simple. What do you think?
> 
> If the limit is really 4G, I'm fine with whatever is the smallest
> practical size. If 256 bytes works for you:
> 
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>

Thanks guys, will apply the first patch, bumping it to 256.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/