[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111021121759.429d8222.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:17:59 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...allels.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
GregThelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>, Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Isolated memory cgroups again
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:45:55 -0700
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Thu 20-10-11 16:41:27, Ying Han wrote:
> [...]
> > Hi Michal:
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > I didn't read through the patch itself but only the description. If we
> > wanna protect a memcg being reclaimed from under global memory
> > pressure, I think we can approach it by making change on soft_limit
> > reclaim.
> >
> > I have a soft_limit change built on top of Johannes's patchset, which
> > does basically soft_limit aware reclaim under global memory pressure.
>
> Is there any link to the patch(es)? I would be interested to look at
> it before we discuss it.
>
I'd like to see it, too.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists