[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKTCnz=0VcM9zi2Apv0YOrYPRqe6Cmm_QDcBj5t2nMo1=f9+Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:41:43 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...allels.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
GregThelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>, Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Isolated memory cgroups again
> But I personally think we should make softlimit better rather than
> adding new interface. If this feature can be archieved when setting
> softlimit=UNLIMITED, it's simple. And Johannes' work will make this
> easy to be implemented.
> (total rewrite of softlimit should be required...I think.)
>
Yeah.. I'd be open to a rewrite if we get the specification/design
right. I did soft limits in a few months and tested it on workloads
till I was satisfied it worked.
Balbir Singh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists