linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOH1cH=1z2kfs-9t6_uyrBamtMFseBxsVBPq=zfJKVK_edTEyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:09:48 -0700
From:	Mark Moseley <moseleymark@...il.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux filesystem caching discussion list 
	<linux-cachefs@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:16 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Mark Moseley <moseleymark@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> >> [67666.389761] kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:426!
>> >
>> > Can you have a look what's on line 426 for you, please?  It's a blank line
>> > in my kernel.  I think I've managed to rearrange my patches to muck the
>> > ordering up.
>>
>> Here's line 426 with some context:
>
> Ah...  It's the same one you've seen before - and now the debugging patch I
> gave you has yielded a bit more context.
>
> David
>

Ok, got another of the "[33353.585702] kernel BUG at
fs/fscache/operation.c:426!" variety. I've attached a dump of fscache
stats from basically the entire uptime of the box, minus the first
couple minutes, right till it went down.

Download attachment "fscache.stats.20111021.gz" of type "application/x-gzip" (85232 bytes)