[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111021202911.GA1633@x4.trippels.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:29:11 +0200
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS read hangs in 3.1-rc10
On 2011.10.21 at 09:22 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:42:14PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> >
> > [<ffffffff8126f205>] xfs_reclaim_inode+0x85/0x2b0
> > [<ffffffff8126f5b0>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x180/0x2f0
> > [<ffffffff8126f74e>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x2e/0x40
> > [<ffffffff8126ccf0>] xfs_fs_free_cached_objects+0x10/0x20
> > [<ffffffff81119a70>] prune_super+0x110/0x1b0
> > [<ffffffff810e4fa5>] shrink_slab+0x1e5/0x2a0
> > [<ffffffff810e5821>] kswapd+0x7c1/0xba0
> > [<ffffffff8107ada6>] kthread+0x96/0xb0
> > [<ffffffff816c0474>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> We're stuck in synchronous inode reclaim.
>
> > All of the other processes that get stuck have this stack:
> >
> > [<ffffffff81080587>] down+0x47/0x50
> > [<ffffffff8125e816>] xfs_buf_lock+0x66/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff812603ad>] _xfs_buf_find+0x16d/0x270
> > [<ffffffff81260517>] xfs_buf_get+0x67/0x1a0
> > [<ffffffff8126067a>] xfs_buf_read+0x2a/0x120
> > [<ffffffff812b876f>] xfs_trans_read_buf+0x28f/0x3f0
> > [<ffffffff8129e161>] xfs_read_agi+0x71/0x100
>
> They are waiting for the AGI buffer to become unlocked. The only reason
> it is held locked for longer time is when it is under I/O.
>
> >
> > By the way, xfs_reclaim_inode+0x85 (133) disassembles as:
>
> >
> > ...So the next function is wait_for_completion(), which is marked
> > __sched and thus doesn't show up in the trace.
>
> So we're waiting for the inode to be flushed, aka I/O again.
>
> What is interesting here is that we're always blocking on the AGI
> buffer - which is used during unlinks of inodes, and thus gets hit
> fairly heavily for a workload that does a lot of unlinks.
>
> Given that you are doing a lot of unlinks I wonder if it is related
> to the recent ail pushing issues in that area. While your symptoms
> looks completely different we could be blocking on the flush completion
> for an inode that gets stuck in the AIL.
>
> Can you run with latest 3.0-stable plus the patches at:
Please not that he saw this in 3.1-rc10, too. And this version already
contains the fixes:
% git describe --contains 0030807c66f0582
v3.1-rc10~5^2
I just saw similar symptoms while running a weekly rsync backup job. The
machine was stuck for a few seconds several times during that time (no
response to mouse or keyboard input). It always recovered by itself
after a short while.
This is an example output of latencytop during the rsync run:
Cause Maximum Percentage
[xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag] 7847.0 msec 16.6 %
Fork() system call 7777.1 msec 25.5 %
Creating block layer request 5352.5 msec 18.1 %
[xfs_buf_iowait] 2000.4 msec 14.7 %
[down] 959.7 msec 2.0 %
Page fault 637.3 msec 1.4 %
[xfs_iunpin_wait] 557.4 msec 0.7 %
Unlinking file 66.8 msec 0.1 %
I also took some "perf timechart" recordings. If there is interest I
could post the svg images somewhere.
--
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists