[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319241499.5930.24.camel@schurl.linbit>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:58:18 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...nel.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:42 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/richacl_xattr.c b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
> index 02a7986..31e33b5 100644
> --- a/fs/richacl_xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
> @@ -58,19 +58,14 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
> goto fail_einval;
>
> richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
> - const char *who = (void *)(xattr_ace + 1), *end;
> - ssize_t used = (void *)who - value;
>
> - if (used > size)
> - goto fail_einval;
> - end = memchr(who, 0, size - used);
> - if (!end)
> + if (((void *)xattr_ace + sizeof(*xattr_ace)) > (value + size))
> goto fail_einval;
This check can be moved out of the loop now.
Other than that, I'm happy with the patch; acked.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists