[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319181973.3964.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:26:13 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>
Cc: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"ilw@...ux.intel.com" <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: iwlagn is getting very shaky
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 10:23 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > > [17419.285141] iwlagn 0000:06:00.0: Encounter TX_STATUS_FAIL_PASSIVE_NO_RX, am I on 5.2G band? (0)
> > > [17419.286583] wlan0: deauthenticating from 00:24:c4:ab:bd:ef by local choice (reason=2)
> > > [17419.300296] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: JP
> > > [17419.309278] wlan0: authenticate with 00:24:c4:ab:bd:ef (try 1)
> > > [17419.310105] wlan0: authenticated
> > > [17419.317900] wlan0: associate with 00:24:c4:ab:bd:ef (try 1)
> >
> > It seems a bit like the 5 GHz AP (:e0) just fails, and wpa_supplicant
> > selects a 2.4 GHz AP (:ef) now? Pure conjecture, I guess the AP could
> > also be on the same channel -- did you have scan information for these
> > APs?
>
> BSS 00:24:c4:ab:bd:e0 (on wlan0)
> freq: 2412
> And the one I am on:
> BSS 00:24:c4:ab:bd:ef (on wlan0) -- associated
> freq: 5200
> No idea if that helps you.
Yes, thanks. So it's actually the other way around I guess.
I'm wondering if this too is related to the channel mess in mac80211.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists