[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111022070952.GA24475@in.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:39:52 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/X] uprobes: x86: introduce abort_xol()
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 06:42:21PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/21, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
...
> > For instance, on x86, it points to the next
> > instruction,
>
> No?
At exception entry, we'd not have done the following fixup...
> /**
> * get_uprobe_bkpt_addr - compute address of bkpt given post-bkpt regs
> * @regs: Reflects the saved state of the task after it has hit a breakpoint
> * instruction.
> * Return the address of the breakpoint instruction.
> */
> unsigned long __weak get_uprobe_bkpt_addr(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> return instruction_pointer(regs) - UPROBES_BKPT_INSN_SIZE;
> }
>
> Yes, initially regs->ip points to the next insn after int3, but
> utask->vaddr == get_uprobe_bkpt_addr() == addr of int3.
>
> Right?
Yes, we fix it up so we point to the right (breakpoint) address.
> > while on powerpc, the nip points to the breakpoint vaddr
> > at the time of exception.
>
> I think get_uprobe_bkpt_addr() should be consistent on every arch.
> That is why (I think) it is __weak.
Yes, that is the intention.
> Anyway, abort_xol() has to be arch-specific.
Agree.
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists