[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111023162159.80444iahzf390vi8@guarana.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:21:59 +1100
From: Kevin Easton <kevin@...rana.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LSM: Do not apply mmap_min_addr check to PROT_NONE
mappings
Quoting Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>:
> [ Resent, this seems to have gotten dropped by something. Sorry if it
> shows up twice ]
My fault, looks like lkml.org trims the CC list to an unreasonably small
value.
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Kevin Easton <kevin@...rana.org> wrote:
>>
>> Won't this still allow silent probing, because the malicious user can
>> just try to create the mapping, then check in /proc/self/maps to see
>> if it really worked?
>
> Yup, right you are.
>
> So we shouldn't do that either, and probably just leave the current
> semantics, unless Roland (or others) can convince me that complicating
> the kernel mmap security model really is worth it.
>
> Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists