linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.1-rc10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy3GHzho33yki0=c=Hh4GuJY_+DPqn7esw-AF8KZ0=AbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:42:11 +0300
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc10

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Are you going to accept pull requests from non-k.org remotes?

For something like freedesktop.org, I have no trouble at all. It's the
totally anonymous trees that I don't want to worry about - they've
been ok for the later part of the -rc stage, when the commits are few
and small and I can just verify that it all looks ok, but for big
changes I definitely want more of a trustworthy source.

Oh, but make sure your pull requests are valid. Look at the pull
requests you've been sending me: they have things like "~/" in them,
which probably works for you, but does *not* work for me. You need to
make it "~airlied/" or whatever. Again, fixing things like that up is
fine when I only have a few small pull requests, but it's a major pain
in the rear during the chaos that is the merge window.

Thanks,
          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/